JESUS LIBERADOR JON SOBRINO PDF
on the works of Father Jon SOBRINO, SJ: Jesucristo liberador. Lectura histórico- teológica de Jesús de Nazaret (Madrid, ) and La fe en. Download Citation on ResearchGate | JESUCRISTO LIBERADOR/ JON SOBRINO | INDICE }. Notification on the Works of Father Jon Sobrino S. J. Jesucristo Liberador. Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. | Libreria Editrice Vaticana |
|Country:||Sao Tome and Principe|
|Published (Last):||28 May 2008|
|PDF File Size:||16.66 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||20.55 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
If you are a seller for this product, would you like to suggest updates through seller support?
Jesucristo liberador : lectura histórica teológica de Jesús de Nazaret in SearchWorks catalog
In his book Jesus the Liberator: If Jesus were a believer like ourselves, albeit in an exemplary manner, he would not be able to be the true Revealer showing us the face of the Father. It is only in this ecclesial faith that all other theological foundations find their correct epistemological setting.
On the other hand, the singularity and the unicity of the mediation of Christ has always been affirmed by the Church. ComiXology Thousands of Digital Comics. It was determined that, although the author had modified his thought somewhat on several points, the Response did not prove satisfactory since, in substance, the errors already cited in the list of erroneous propositions still remained in this text.
He does not take into account the fact that the transtemporal subject of the faith is the believing Church, and that the pronouncements of the first Councils have been accepted and lived by the entire ecclesial community. The Congregation does not intend to judge libefador subjective intentions of the Author, but rather has the duty to call to attention to certain propositions which are not in conformity with the doctrine of the Church.
This is a point of special interest in his works. Father Sobrino considers the dogmatic development of the first centuries of the Church including the great Councils to be ambiguous and even negative. The sections below will treat these specific questions. Shopbop Designer Fashion Brands.
It is insufficient to speak of an intimate connection, or of a constitutive relatedness between Jesus and the Kingdom, or of the finality of the mediator [ ultimidad del mediador ], if this suggests something that is distinct from Jesus himself. This identity has been placed in relief since the patristic period. The Author certainly affirms a special relationship between Jesus mediator and the Kingdom of God that which is mediatedin as far as Jesus is the definitive, ultimate, and eschatological mediator of the Kingdom.
Amazon Music Stream millions of songs. By virtue of this possibility, the Council of Ephesus has already defined that Mary was Theotokos: This saving efficacy is shown more in the form of an exemplary cause than of an efficient cause.
The Divinity of Jesus Christ 4. According to the Author, the person of Jesus as mediator cannot be absolutized, but must be contemplated in his relatedness to the Kingdom of God, which is apparently considered to be something distinct from Jesus himself:.
Other points of departure for theological work run the risk of arbitrariness and end in a misrepresentation of the same faith. AAS 91 The Second Vatican Council teaches: The theologian, in his particular vocation in the Church, must continually bear in mind that theology is the science of the faith.
Learn more about Amazon Prime. Get fast, free shipping with Amazon Prime. Share your thoughts with other customers. There is always a Moses and a promised land, and Archbishop Romero and a dream of justice. Write a customer review. According to the Author, the New Testament does not clearly affirm the divinity of Jesus, but merely establishes the presuppositions for it: It is not clear that the Son is Jesus and oiberador Jesus is the Son.
Although the preoccupation of the Author for the plight of the poor is admirable, the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith has the obligation to indicate that the aforementioned works of Father Sobrino contain notable discrepancies with the faith of the Church.
Certainly, it is sobribo to recognize the limited character of dogmatic formulations, which do not express nor are able to express everything contained in the mystery of faith, and sobrinp be interpreted in the light of Sacred Scripture and Tradition.
AAS 43; DH This affirmation of Father Sobrino seems, at first glance, limited to the idea that Jesus did not attribute a salvific value jeesus his death using the categories that the Hon Testament later employed. The death of Christ is exemplum and not sacramentum gift.
In reference to John 1: Precisely because of the knowledge and experience of the Father which he alone has, even at this moment of darkness he sees clearly the gravity of sin and suffers because of it.
Jpn Inspire Digital Educational Resources. The Councils do not signify a hellenization of Christianity but rather the contrary. In particular, the New Testament affirmations concerning the divinity of Christ, his filial consciousness and the salvific value of his death, do not in fact always receive the attention due them.
The Author maintains only that Jesus went to his death confidently, and attributed to it an exemplary value for others. This point has an evident connection both with what is said above in number IV concerning the relationship between Jesus and the Kingdom, and what will be said in VI below concerning the salvific value that Jesus attributed to his death.
It does not correctly explain the essential nexus that exists between mediator and mediation, to use his words. Thus, the understanding of the communicatio idiomatum which the Author presents reveals an erroneous conception of the mystery of the Incarnation and of the unity of the person of Jesus Christ. According to the Author, the person of Jesus as mediator cannot be absolutized, but must be contemplated in his relatedness to the Kingdom of God, which is apparently considered to be something distinct from Jesus himself: For this reason, it was decided to publish this Notificationin order to offer the faithful a secure criterion, founded upon the doctrine of the Church, by which to judge the affirmations contained in these books or in other publications of the Author.
AAS 92 And for his own part he adds: There’s a problem loading this menu right now. Amazon Second Chance Pass it on, trade it in, give it a second life. The relationship between Jesus and God is not correctly expressed by saying Jesus was a believer like us.